![]() Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff The idea of phenomenology. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book. Ideen zu einer reinen Ph änomenologie und phänomenologische Philosophie Buch II. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie Buch I Husserliana III/1–2. Orth (Ed.), Phänomenologische Forschungen, 24, pp. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1992). Frankfurt: Klostermann The metaphysical foundations of logic. Hölderlins Hymnen ‘Germanien’ und ‘Der Rhein’. ![]() Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1988). Frankfurt: Klosermann The fundamental problems of phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (1985). Jaeger (Ed.), Frankfurt: Klostermann History of the concept of time. Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. State University of New York Press (1996), Albany Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1998). Frankfurt: Klosermann Letter concerning ‘Humanism’. Berkeley: University of California Press (1976). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck The universality of the hermeneutical problem. Die Universalität des hermenteutischen Problems. (eds) Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science. Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division 1. Does the Husserl/Heidegger Feud rest on a mistake? An essay on psychological and transcendental phenomenology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeĬrowell S. Heidegger’s analytic: Interpretation, discourse and authenticity in Being and Time. Phenomenological reduction and the double life of the subject. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ, pp. I then go on to briefly outline a more plausible basis for understanding the difference between Husserl’s and Heidegger’s phenomenologies in terms of their respective emphases on logic and on poetics.īernasconi R. The place of authenticity and the first person perspective in his work derive from his phenomenological commitments, which can be seen in his accounts of discourse and language and of falling ( Verfallen). Turning to Heidegger, I argue that his commitment to a form of the phenomenological reduction precludes him from being either a semantic or a social externalist. This, however, is not the case as can be seen once the reduction is understood not as setting aside the existence of the world, but rather a reflection on its meaning. I argue that Husserl can only be understood as an internalist on the assumption that immanence equates with internal. After first outlining the assumptions regarding inner and outer and the individual and the social from which recent epistemological interpretations of phenomenology begin, I turn to the question of Husserl’s internalism. Both philosophers, it is argued, employ the phenomenological reduction to immanence as a fundamental methodological instrument. This paper argues that the Husserl–Heidegger relationship is systematically misunderstood when framed in terms of a distinction between internalism and externalism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |